UV protection
Reducing ultraviolet exposure.
A guide for drivers, patients & installers
Understand your state’s window-tint rules, how UV protection differs from darkness, and what medical documentation can—and cannot—authorize.
Reviewed October 14, 2026
Reducing ultraviolet exposure.
Reducing solar heat entering the vehicle.
Reducing visible brightness.
These are different performance characteristics. Darker tint does not automatically provide better UV protection. Compare documented UV filtering, heat rejection, and visible transmission separately.
Visible light transmission (VLT) is the percentage of visible light that passes through. Higher percentages mean more light passes through and a lighter-looking window. Reflectance measures light reflected outward; total solar energy rejection (TSER) describes overall heat-rejection performance.
Film-only VLT differs from finished glass-plus-film VLT. For a rough estimate, 80% glass × 90% film ≈ 72% combined VLT. Do not multiply again when a specification already measures film on reference glass. Product shade names alone do not establish compliance. Have your installer measure the finished window.
Arizona
MVD issues the exemption. A physician’s certification supports the application. Purchasing a medical evaluation or obtaining a physician letter is not MVD approval. The medical exemption covers qualifying side and rear windows, not full-windshield tint.
| Window | Visible light transmission | Other requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Front side windows & wing vents | 33% combined glass-and-film VLT, with statutory ±3% tolerance. | 35% reflectance limit, also with ±3% tolerance. Treat tolerance as a measurement allowance, not a target. |
| Rear side & rear windows | No minimum VLT stated in this section. | Subsection (A)(6) specifies reflectance of 35% ±3% or less. A separate rear-window exception applies with both outside mirrors providing at least a 200-foot rear view. Retain functional mirrors and check the applicable provision. |
The ordinary transparent strip belongs at the topmost windshield portion. Its lower edge must be at least 29 inches above the undepressed driver’s seat, measured from a point five inches ahead of the bottom of the backrest, with the seat fully rearward and lowered and the vehicle level. The strip cannot be red or amber.
ADOT’s medical application says the exemption does not apply below the AS-1 line; the statute uses the seat-based measurement above. Have the installer verify the permitted boundary. Do not assume a universal four-inch or five-inch rule. Nearly clear UV film is not automatically lawful across the full windshield.
Use current ADOT Form 40-1511 and its certification requirements. The form calls for a personal examination and inadequate protection from eye-protective devices alone. ADOT’s FAQ also requests a physician letter and vehicle registration copy. Follow the current agency instructions.
Approval is not guaranteed. The exemption may cover a vehicle you own or one in which you are a habitual passenger. Keep the certificate in the vehicle and follow its actual window, VLT, expiration, and other conditions; the statute does not set a universal exempt VLT or three-year term.
Apply in ArizonaCalifornia
California medical documentation does not authorize arbitrary dark permanent tint on the windshield or front side windows.
These provisions rely on carried documentation rather than an Arizona-style DMV-issued tint permit. The document must match the applicable route.
Vehicle Code §26708(d) permits clear, colorless, transparent film on the windows immediately beside the front seat. It requires at least 88% material VLT and 70% combined glass-and-film VLT, the referenced federal glazing and abrasion standards, and enhanced UVA blocking.
Carry the signed installer compliance certificate identifying the installer and manufacturer by full name and street address. Owner-installed film requires the manufacturer certificate described in the statute. A medical letter is not required for an installation meeting this ordinary provision. Remove or replace deteriorated film that impairs clear vision.
Under §26708(e), qualifying clear, colorless, transparent UV-protective film may be installed on the windshield, side, or rear windows. The 88% material and 70% combined VLT requirements remain, along with the referenced federal glazing standards, UVA-blocking purpose, and removal or replacement of deteriorated film that impairs vision.
The driver must carry, personally or in the vehicle, a certificate signed by a licensed dermatologist certifying the medical need for the clear UV film. A general physician letter does not substitute for this certificate. This route has no nighttime prohibition like the removable-screen route.
Section 26708(b)(10) covers qualifying front-side-window devices. The driver or front-seat passenger must possess a signed physician-and-surgeon letter for a medical condition, or an optometrist letter for a visual condition. These devices cannot be used during darkness.
Section 26708.2 requires ready removal, such as a frame, temporary fasteners, or roller shade. Transparent devices must be green, gray, or neutral smoke with at least 35% luminous transmittance. Reflectivity cannot exceed 35% on either surface. Louvered or patterned devices need an essentially uniform pattern, at least 35% open area, and opaque sections no more than 3/16 inch in projected vertical dimension.
Ordinary adhesive film does not qualify simply because it could eventually be peeled off.
Rear side windows have no minimum VLT under §26708(b)(4). The rear window has no minimum VLT when both outside mirrors provide at least a 200-foot rear view.
The ordinary topmost windshield strip uses the 29-inch seat-based measurement: measure from a point five inches ahead of the bottom of the backrest, with the seat fully rearward and lowered, the vehicle level, and the seat undepressed. It cannot be red or amber, contain opaque lettering, distort vision or primary colors, or create more reflected glare than untreated glass. This is not a universal four-inch or five-inch strip rule.
Medical Documentation for Qualifying Sun Protection
Apply in CaliforniaYes. Nearly clear films can provide substantial UV filtering with little additional visible darkening. The manufacturer examples below illustrate the technology; they are not product endorsements or proof of compliance for your vehicle.
| Film | VLT on reference glass | Reported UV rejection |
|---|---|---|
| LLumar AU 85 UV | 87% | Over 99% |
| LLumar AIR 90 | 84% | Over 99% |
| 3M Crystalline 90 | 86% | 99.9% |
These figures do not establish the film-only VLT or show that a product automatically meets California’s requirements on every vehicle. The cited 3M sheet measures clear reference glass at 89% before film and 86% with Crystalline 90.
UV rejection depends on the tested wavelength range. LLumar’s cited sheet measures UV protection over 300–380 nm; a “99% UV” claim does not establish filtering at every wavelength through 400 nm. Request a spectral transmission report when wavelength coverage matters.
Obtain the exact product specifications and finished-window measurements from your installer. For heat reduction, compare TSER and full-range infrared energy rejection at similar VLT. “Ceramic” or “medical grade” is not proof of compliance.
Medical necessity & HSA funds
Medically necessary window film may qualify for payment or reimbursement using HSA funds, depending on the individual circumstances and applicable IRS requirements. Published benefits guidance includes medically recommended automotive window tint as a potentially qualifying expense. However, IRS Publication 502 does not specifically list window tint as an approved expense.
A Letter of Medical Necessity can document the condition being addressed and explain why UV filtration, visible-light reduction, or both are medically recommended. General comfort, appearance, privacy, or cosmetic preferences alone do not establish medical necessity.
Before claiming the expense, consult your tax adviser. Retain your medical documentation, the film specifications, and an itemized installation receipt. A physician’s recommendation or state medical tint exemption does not guarantee eligibility.
Tint-Rx now offers an additional Letter of Medical Necessity when clinically appropriate. It is separate from state-specific tint documentation and is not automatically included with an evaluation. Neither document substitutes for the other or permits tint that violates state law.
Ask About an HSA LetterPlease do not email medical records or payment information.
Sources: IRS Publication 502 · IRS Publication 969 · Kushner & Company HSA/FSA expense guide (PDF). The Kushner guide is an example of published benefits guidance, not IRS authority or a guarantee of current eligibility.
No. State tint exemptions and HSA eligibility are separate determinations. A state exemption addresses applicable tint restrictions; HSA eligibility depends on federal tax requirements and the individual expense.
When clinically appropriate, it documents the patient’s medical condition and explains the medical purpose of the recommended window film. It supports the medical rationale but does not guarantee reimbursement.
Do not assume that an entire tint package qualifies. Medical documentation should support the specific features needed for your condition. Cosmetic upgrades and unrelated expenses may not qualify.
Keep your Letter of Medical Necessity, itemized installation receipt, proof of payment, and film specifications. HSA funds cannot be used to claim an expense already reimbursed elsewhere or also taken as an itemized medical deduction.
No. HSA documentation does not change Arizona or California tint laws or replace required state-specific documentation.
Coming soon. Tint-Rx is developing a separate medical-necessity evaluation and documentation service for residential window film. This service is not yet available. Tax treatment of home improvements may differ from automotive expenses.
No. Nearly clear film can substantially reduce UV exposure. Visible darkness and UV filtering are different measurements; ask for the exact technical specifications.
No. Arizona requires an MVD-issued exemption before relying on that exemption. California documentation must match a specific statutory route, and the device or film must satisfy its requirements. A purchase guarantees neither physician nor state approval or immunity from citations.
No. The medical exemption authorizes qualifying side and rear window changes. It does not authorize full-windshield tint. Ordinary windshield-strip rules remain separate.
The medical provisions described here do not authorize arbitrary dark permanent windshield or front-side tint. The medical film route requires clear, colorless, transparent material meeting the 88% material and 70% combined VLT requirements and a dermatologist’s certificate.
Yes. Medical clear film requires dermatologist certification and the clear-film standards. Removable screens use the appropriate physician or optometrist letter, must meet §26708.2 device standards, and cannot be used during darkness.
Do not assume reciprocity. Verify the rules where you drive, particularly if the vehicle is routinely used in both states. California’s medical windshield-film provision does not create an Arizona windshield exemption.
In Arizona, retain the MVD exemption certificate and follow its conditions. California’s ordinary clear-film route requires the applicable installer or manufacturer compliance certificate; the medical clear-film route requires the dermatologist certificate. For removable screens, the driver or front-seat passenger must possess the appropriate letter. Keep installation records and product specifications as well.
Reviewed October 14, 2026. Statutory summaries are educational explanations. FindLaw links reproduce statutory text and are not official government sources.
Download the Arizona & California Tint Guide
This information is educational and does not certify a particular installation as compliant. Requirements depend on the applicable law, vehicle glazing, film specifications, and any exemption conditions.